PANINGKAMOT-PAGSIKAPAN

(STRIVE)

Strengthening the Implementation of Basic Education

in Selected Provinces of the Visayas

 

 

 

 

STAGE 1 - PROJECT BRIEF

 

PANINGKAMOT – PAGSIKAPAN (STRIVE) is a DepED project supported by the Government of Australia through AusAID, intended to provide flexible and responsive assistance in strengthening basic education in selected provinces in the Visayas and to provide basic education opportunities to out-of-school children and youth, including piloting support options for out-of-school children and youth

STRIVE

PARTNERS:

GoP

- A Project of the Department of Education

- Coordinated by EDPITAF

. . . making a difference

 

GoA

- Supported by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)

- With Technical Assistance from the Melbourne Development Institute (MDI)

 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

 

STRIVE Project

Project Management Unit (PMU)

DepED Division Office, CPG Ave.,

Tagbilaran City, Bohol

Telefax No. (038) 411-2544

Telephone No. (038) 501-0164

 

 

Sub-Project Management Unit (Sub-PMU)

Bulwagan ng mga Guro

DepED Division Office,

Catarman, Northern Samar

Telefax No. (055) 500-9384

                                                            

 

 

 

PANINGKAMOT

                                    

                                                                                                                                     

GOAL:

To contribute to the improvement of rural living standards in selected provinces of the Visayas through improving the quality of, and access to, basic education (Stage I – Bohol and Northern Samar)

PURPOSE:

To assist DepED to improve the performance of school students in English, Science and Mathematics

 

Assist the DepED to increase the participation of children and youth (up to 21) in basic education.

COMPONENTS:

C.1.            Leadership And Management Development

Objective:  Strengthen education leadership and management capacity in the target provinces.

 

C.2.            Teacher Development

Objective:  Enhance the capacity of pre & in-service teacher training, particularly for improving the teaching of mathematics, science and English

 

C.3.            Teaching and Learning Materials

Objective:  Support for the adaptation, development, production and distribution of appropriate science, mathematics, EL and other teaching/learning materials to schools

 

C.4.            Programs to Support OSC/Y and their Families

Objective:  Assist DepED in the development of support options, including livelihood skills programs, to enhance the participation of children and youth (up to the age of 21) in basic education.

 

 

 

 

PAGSIKAPAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.5.            Project Management

Objective:  Manage the project in an effective, efficient and responsive manner.

Scope:

§          Bohol (including Tagbilaran City Division)

§          Northern Samar

Duration:

 

Timing:

§          18 months

 

§          October 2005 to April 2007

 

SKILLSSTRIVECOACHING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- STAGE 1 - PROJECT BRIEF -

 

PANINGKAMOT – PAGSIKAPAN (STRIVE) is a DepED project supported by the Government of Australia through AusAID, intended to provide flexible and responsive assistance in strengthening basic education in selected provinces in the Visayas and to provide basic education opportunities to out-of-school children and youth, including piloting support options for out-of-school children and youth.

 

 

 

  PARTNERS:

 

GoP

- A Project of the Department of Education

- Coordinated by EDPITAF

 

 

 

 

GoA

- Supported by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)

- With Technical Assistance from the Melbourne Development Institute (MDI)

 

 

 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

 

 

GOAL:

To contribute to the improvement of rural living standards in selected provinces of the Visayas through improving the quality of, and access to, basic education (Stage I – Bohol and Northern Samar)

 

 

PURPOSE:

To assist DepED to improve the performance of school students in English, Science and Mathematics

 

Assist the DepED to increase the participation of children and youth (up to 21) in basic education.

 

 

COMPONENTS:

C.1.     Leadership And Management Development

Objective:  Strengthen education leadership and management capacity in the target provinces.

 

C.2.     Teacher Development

Objective:  Enhance the capacity of pre & in-service teacher training, particularly for improving the teaching of mathematics, science and English

 

C.3.     Teaching and Learning Materials

Objective:  Support for the adaptation, development, production and distribution of appropriate science, mathematics, EL and other teaching/learning materials to schools

 

C.4.     Programs to Support OSC/Y and their Families

Objective:  Assist DepED in the development of support options, including livelihood skills programs, to enhance the participation of children and youth (up to the age of 21) in basic education.

 

C.5.     Project Management

Objective:  Manage the project in an effective, efficient and responsive manner.

 

 

Scope:

§      Bohol (including Tagbilaran City Division)

§      Northern Samar

Duration:

 

Timing:

§      18 months

 

§      October 2005 to April 2007


 

      Project Structure

 

GOAL: To contribute to the improvement of rural living standards in selected provinces of the Visayas through improving the quality of, and access to, basic education (Stage I – Bohol and Northern Samar)

 

PURPOSE: To assist DepED to improve the performance of school students in English, Science and Mathematics

 

Assist the DepED to increase the participation of children and youth (up to 21) in basic education.

 

 

C.1.     LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT

C.2.     TEACHER DEVELOPMENT

C.3.     TEACHING AND LEARNING MATERIALS

C.4.     PROGRAMS FOR OSC/Y & FAMILIES

C.5.     PROJECT MANAGEMENT

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.1 TNA for educational leaders

c.2.1 TNA for teachers of math, science and English

c.3.1 Appropriate teaching/learning materials identified and adapted

c.4.1 Targets identified, needs confirmed and strategy

c.5.1 Establishment of project offices

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.2 Master Training Plan

c.2.2 PD for ISFs implemented

c.3.2 Region VII RLMC upgraded; Region VIII RLMC established

c.4.2 Support opportunities identified

c.5.2 Effective project management framework implemented

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.3 Trainers trained to deliver training

c.2.3 Stronger TEIs in pre/ in-service for math, science and English teachers

c.3.3 Resource Units in each Province

c.4.3 Stronger partnerships for providers and stakeholders

c.5.3 M&E Framework and QA and Sustainability Strategies

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.4 Training programs delivered

 

c.2.4  ISFs provide training

c.3.4 TNA and training for materials development

c.4.4 Alternative delivery, literacy and support programs piloted

c.5.4 Effective relationships with stakeholders

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.5 Stronger partnerships to support basic education

c.2.5 Strategies to retain at-risk students

c.3.5 Supplementary materials distributed

c.4.5 Stronger school community

c.5.5 Project management and sustainability plan implemented

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.6 Stronger Division EMIS capability

 

 

 

 

c.5.6 M&E Plan implemented

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.7 Network of lead and satellite schools

 

 

 

 

c.5.7 Project costs managed to achieve high value for money

 

 

 

 

Summary of Project Progress – Stage 1

(as of end of December 2006)

(as per Performance Indicators Revised Log Frame February 2006)*

 

Component 1:         Leadership and Management Development

 

Objective:     Strengthen educational leadership and management capacity in target provinces.

 

 

Output

Performance Indicator for Period

Progress Status (as per MOV)

1.1

Training Needs Analysis result for selected Regions, Divisions in the Visayas. Superintendents, ES, District Supervisors and School Principal/ Head aligned with the latest management responsibilities as outlined in current DepED policy

Detailed TNA methodology for  leadership / management training completed and revised for future use by DepED

§  TNA Methodology endorsed by Region VII and NEAP on 6 January 2006

§  TNA Methodology endorsed by Region VII and NEAP had been revised to accommodate certain specifications of the Region VIII Director. Such methodology had been endorse by Region VIII on 24 January 2006

 

100% of the management responsibilities identified from DepED Orders, RA9155 and IRR are included in the TNA skills audit survey

§  Accomplished - as reflected in the TNA instrument all competencies used (24 school head competencies, 44 division competencies and 42 region competencies) as basis to determine current level of competencies are the prescribed skills by NEAP. These competencies had been culled from DepED Orders, RA9155 and IRR and validated with DepED Educational leaders.

 

At least 20% of the principals/ school heads) and at least 75% of other educational leaders (Region, Division) complete TNA, profile information and baseline survey.  (Participants selected  by stratified sampling)

§  Accomplished. Obtained 99% response from the target school head respondents

§  TNA for educational leaders at the region and division level were based on an organization needs level rather than on an individual training needs.  As a result, the proposed 75% respondents from the region and division levels were not required.

 

TNA completed and endorsed by the DepED Regional Directors and NEAP

§  TNA summary endorsed by Region VII on 15 March 06

§  TNA summary endorsed by Region VIII on 20 March 06

§  TNA summary endorsed by NEAP as part of MTP

§  TNA methodology turned over to NEAP

 

1.2

Master Training Plan for educational leaders and managers in selected Regions and Divisions in Visayas.

(1.2 continued)

The Training Plan demonstrates direct links to the TNA findings

 

 

 

 

 

§  TNA summary information was included as part of the MTP. The training programs identified in the MTP were fashioned to be competency-based, reflecting the exact competencies used in the needs analysis and the prioritizing of the learning competencies were directly linked to the results of the TNA.

 

The training delivery strategy is developed

§  Training delivery for programs used a combination of methodologies ranging from direct training to follow-up programs such as coaching and on-the-job learning.

 

Evaluation instruments designed, tested, revised and finalized

§  MTP M&E Framework has been developed. TM&E instruments are developed and being utilized within training programs. TM&E data derived from progress monitoring are processed in a training database developed by the MES Adviser and reported to PME. Instrumentation being reviewed and refined on an on-going basis.

Master Training Plan for selected Regions and Divisions are accepted by Regional Directors, endorsed to Central Office and accredited by NEAP

§  Endorsed by Region VII 15 on March 2006

§  Endorsed by Region VIII 20 on  March 2006

§  Endorsed by NEAP on 3 March 2006

§  MTP development methodology and documentation turned over to NEAP

1.3

DepED managers/ leaders trained as trainers to deliver the leadership and management programs to educational managers.

Accredited trainer-training programs/study tours (national and international) content & methodology

 

 

 

§  Executed the contract for training with four accredited & nationally/internationally recognized training providers: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), Australian Principals’ Center, SEAMEO Innotech, and DepED’s National Educators Academy of the Philippines (NEAP)

§  Training program had been developed and conducted by the training service providers per specifications of the MTP

Independent selection process for prospective trainers (based on the requirements of the TNA) endorsed by Regional Directors and NEAP

§  The certification of endorsement of Trainers’ selection criteria and independent selection process was signed by the Regional Directors and NEAP in 3 March 2006 together with the MTP.

At least 10 leadership and management trainers from each province successfully complete accredited training

 

 

§  A total of 29 leadership and management (15 from Bohol and 14 from NSamar) trainers from both provinces successfully completed in-country and overseas training covering training skills development and content on participatory school improvement planning and educational leadership.

§  The trainers are complemented with the training of 10 quasi-trainers (5 from each province) whose main focus is the monitoring and evaluation of the training program. These trainer-M&E team also completed the prescribed in-country trainers’ training program and skills development on monitoring and evaluation of training programs.

§  10 Senior Education Leaders from Central Office, Region VII and VIII participated in an offshore study program May 2006.  Documentation coordinated by EDPITAF and completed by participants May 2006

§  Contract of service has been executed with the trainers.

§  Training completion reports and evaluation provided by NEAP, SEAMEO and RMIT - July 2006

1.4

Leadership and management training delivered to education leaders and managers in selected Regions and Divisions in the Visayas with priority on lower performing school heads.

 

Leadership & management training modules incorporate outcomes and innovations identified through review of available training programs, research, training placements and/or study tours that  address the key training needs (as per TNA)

 

 

 

§  Training modules developed in conjunction with NEAP and informed by in-country and offshore trainers study programs.

§  Learning portfolio of participants (Education Leaders trained as trainers) had been compiled and used as reference materials in the development and continuous enhancement of the training modules.

§  An Integration of Learning and Learning Exchange Forum presented (Cebu, 14-16 June 2006) had been conducted to report lessons learned from in-country and overseas training and research/study tours.

§  NEAP SIP training modules and SIP training program developed.

In Stage I - at least 80% of education leaders and managers in Northern Samar and at least 40% in Bohol trained in courses delivered by newly accredited DepED trainers.

 

§  To date, 5 of 9 Batches of training had been conducted to educational leaders and managers in Bohol & NSamar following the content and methodology prescribed by MTP.

§  This translates to 451 or 56% (226 in Bohol and 225 in NSamar) of the target 800 target school heads had been trained on participatory educational planning, where the output is a school improvement plan. The training also covered 4 other school community members. The PTCA, student, teacher, and LGU representative from each school have actively participated in the process.

80% of  newly trained educational managers  surveyed indicate they have implemented the action plan developed to implement improved work practices

§  Not yet due

Improved planning at regional, provincial and school level leads to more effective resource utilization

 

§  11 cases documented from Bohol and 6 cases from N. Samara of increased funding granted schools from the use of / result of the work on SIP development.  Documentation by Division management is underway.

§  Early preparation for DEDP underway with training in Module 1 – Data Collection/Collation

1.5

Strengthened partnerships in basic education between PPDO, LGUs, school boards, PTCAs & NGOs.

 

 

(1.5 continued)

Stakeholder analysis completed and base line established incorporating the pre-project situation in target locations

§  Initial baseline survey conducted early February 2006, preliminary report has been prepared based on the initial baseline. A follow-up survey as required will be designed and conducted in the first quarter of 2007.

Number, type and scope of working relationships and partnerships strengthened and/or established through the project.

§  A total of 451 or 56% (226 in Bohol and 225 in NSamar) school planning teams had been strengthened / established through the project

§  A technical evaluation group involving the Provincial school board and DepED Division key personnel had been established to review initiatives /project proposals related to addressing “Access” related indicators.

Number, type, scope and results of new cooperative activities undertaken.

§  100% participation of parent, teacher, student and LGU representatives in the SIP development of 451 schools

 

1.6

Strengthened capacity of Divisional

DepED offices to collect and analyze data on basic education in relation to the target groups.

Analysis of BEIS, NAT and other baseline data completed.

§  Pre-project baseline established as part of draft Baseline Report.  Some data, however, is currently being validated.

Enhanced facilities & equipment in place to enable improved collection, storage and analysis of data

§  Computer equipment (desk top, laptop, software, hard drive back-up, UPS) and LCD were provided to 3 School Division Planning Offices  - December 2005

Training needs identified of EMIS Division staff (linked to TNA in Component 1)

§  TNA of Planning Offices conducted by Monitoring, Evaluation and Sustainability Advisor.

Training delivered to Planning Unit/EMIS staff based on TNA

§  Not yet due

Pre-project baseline data.

§  Draft Baseline Report prepared. Still validating data.

Education data produced per OPS-DepED format, quality and standards.

Gender disaggregated data from target groups collected, analyzed & consolidated for DepED use.

§  Meeting conducted with OPS to initiate discussions on DepED format, quality and standards required for education data. (Undertaken May 2006)

§  Division preparation of Division Report Card (education data prepared for planning) due on Feb 2007.

1.7

Network of lead and satellite schools established in each province

Lead school selection standards, process and criteria approved by Regional Offices, BSE, BEE & OPS.

§  Formulation and development of criteria on the selection of lead schools completed May 2006

§  Lead and Satellite Schools selected in July 2006

Information package developed and disseminated on the roles and responsibilities of lead and satellite schools, including an orientation program

§  Base paper is currently being prepared.

Review and accreditation of lead schools conducted

§  Not yet due

 

 

Component 4:         Programs for Out-of-School Children, Youth and Their Families

Objective:     Assist DepED in the development of support options, including livelihood skills programs, to enhance the participation of children and youth (up to the age of 21) in basic education.

 

Output

Performance Indicator for Period

Progress Status (as per MOV)

4.1

Target population for pilots identified, strategy for engagement endorsed and functional literacy status confirmed.

Target populations with high numbers of out-of school children and youth with low levels of basic education identified.

 

§  Strategy for the selection of pilot schools endorsed by SDSs and PPDOs

§  Target population and pilot schools identified

Baseline on school student achievement and other data assembled and used to identify in-school children who are at risk.

§  Baseline on school student achievement data used as reference in identifying Students-At-Risk of Dropping Out (SARDOs)

§  SARDOs identified.

 

Background literature review, research and consultations on the reasons, issues and successful interventions to reduce school drop-outs and attract out of school children and youth to basic education.

§  OSC, OSY, SARDO survey results analysed.

§  Focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted with OSC/Y, parents of OSC/Y, teachers and community representatives (PTCA/SGC/LGU) on school drop-out problem (perceived causes and effects; interventions attempted)

§  School community consultation meetings conducted to validate survey and FGD results.

§  Information gathered on some successful interventions.

§  Gathering of more information a continuing activity.

 

Strategy for engaging target population endorsed by PPDO, mayors, barangay captains and Division Superintendent

§  Strategies for engaging target population endorsed by stakeholders (School Heads, PTCA Presidents, Chairman Education Committee, and Municipal Mayors) accepted and confirmed by SDSs and PPDOs.

 

4.2

Support options (including livelihood skills programs) that enhance/ increase the participation of at-risk and out of school children and youth in basic education are identified, prioritized and endorsed.

Analysis of existing and potential support options that enhance/increase at risk and out of school children and youth participation in basic education.  Prioritization of support options for basic education

§  Seminar undertaken for school heads, PTCA president, municipal/barangay councillor (chairperson of local education committee) to consider various support options with target population.

§  Mission report on Distance Education and Other Alternative Learning Strategies for STRIVE Project completed;

§  Pilot schools identified and prioritized possible support options. Priority list validated with and endorsed by school community.

§  SOBE Fund Manual developed and endorsed – modelling use of SEF funds

 

 

4.3

Strengthening partnerships between DepED, PPDO, LGUs NGOs, agencies, academe, service providers and other stakeholders

Identification and networking/ partnerships with NGOs, PPDO, agencies, academe, LGUs, local service providers is documented.

§  Examples of activities undertaken or are on-going to develop/strengthen partnerships include:

i)    Joint endorsements of the Governor/PPDO and SDS – provincial level and Mayors, Chairpersons of Local Education Committee, and School Heads are providing the foundation for strengthened partnerships;

ii)   Creation of sub-committee under the Provincial/City School Board that will review and evaluate project proposals of pilot schools for funding under the Support Options to Basic Education (SOBE) grant facility

iii)  Stakeholders meeting to discuss OSC/Y (N. Samar);

iv)        Attendance to book launching of monitoring the Millennium Development Goals (MDG)-Bohol;

v) Attendance and observation on BIARSP sponsored training-Bohol;

vi)        Informal talks with NESTLE Philippines Representatives-Bohol,

vii)       Agency visits to TESDA and Heifer International-Bohol

viii)      Agency visits to various provincial/ municipal government offices; local offices of national government agencies; a state university; and NGO were undertaken. Information on services provided and capability to provide the services were gathered, consolidated and disseminated to pilot schools. This will serve as reference in identifying specific potential partners in undertaking the support programs (Northern Samar)

 

Joint activities undertaken:

a)     a plan to support basic education in the target community developed jointly with relevant stakeholders

b)     improvement of quality of collaborative activities of the different stakeholders

 

§  Support to OSC/Y and SARDO concerns on access to quality basic education incorporated by the SPTs in the SIPs of the pilot schools

 

 

Partnership/Service provider selection criteria and MOU/MOA/MOC

§  Exploratory talks on-going with possible service providers (TESDA and UEP).

4.4

Strengthened existing alternative delivery/ distance education modes and ALS programs are piloted for out of school children and youth with low levels of basic education.

 

Support programs (including livelihood skills programs) piloted in target communities to increase the participation of out-of-school children and youth with low levels of basic education.

Alternative basic education delivery program/s

a)     identified, adopted and/or modified

b)     package of modules and other learning materials reproduced per pilot school

c)     package of modules and other learning materials disseminated per pilot school

 

§  Pilot secondary schools submitted letter of intent (SDS endorsed) for implementation of OHSS-EASE

§  Integration of some support programs with the selected ADM on-going (e.g., TLE module to incorporate implementation of business plan component)

§  Enhancement training of Bohol ALS coordinators and mobile teachers on A&E Program conducted

§  Joint training on OHSS-EASE conducted

§  Potential enrolees to EASE identified

§  Orientation meeting conducted with potential EASE enrolees and their parents, as well as with PTCA

§  Reproduction of ALS A&E modules completed

§  Reproduction of EASE modules on-going

§  Distribution of ALS A&E modules underway (Bohol)

 

Plan (4.3) to support basic education used as basis for selection and implementation of support programs.

§  The SIP component on improving access to quality basic education used as basis in identifying, selecting and finalizing list of support programs for OSC/Y and SARDO of the pilot schools

Alternative assessment process for out of school children/youth developed

§  Writeshop to develop alternative assessment process and instrument conducted

§  Revised Functional Literacy Test developed for BALS

§  Testing of alternative instrument on-going

4.5

Strengthening the capacity of the school community, particularly parents of at-risk students, to participate in resource (cash and non-cash) generation activities that can be used for school improvement, particularly for programs to reduce number of students at risk.

As part of the SIP, a School Community Program is developed to address/ support the school in addressing the problem of SARDO

 

§  Pilot schools’ project design teams trained in preparing a project proposal and business plan containing a School Community Program for SARDO

§  On-site technical assistance in finalizing and packaging project proposals and business plans on-going

§  Draft operations manual of the Support Options for Basic Education Fund (SOBEF) endorsed by the Provincial/City School Boards to EDPITAF-DepED for approval by AusAID

Increased level of parental participation in school-based resource generation activities

 

Examples of participation of SARDO parents in resource generation to date:

§  In Nenita Elementary School in N. Samar, parents participated in resource generation for the setting-up of a multi-purpose building that will house the school canteen (also site of feeding program); venue for meetings; temporary quarters for commuting students and teachers, etc.

§  In Pilar High School in Bohol, parents participated in negotiating with the municipal LGU for the use of an adjacent government-owned land for purposes of developing a school model farm.

Plans for utilization of additional resources within the school to address the needs of the SARDO

§  Plans currently being incorporated in the pilot schools’ project proposals.

 

 

Component 5:         Project Management

Objective:             Manage the project in an effective, efficient and responsive manner.

 

 

Output

Performance Indicator for Period

Progress Status (as per MOV)

5.1

Establishment and operating PMU & sub-PMU offices

Established and operating PMU offices

§  PMU and sub-PMU offices established in Tagbilaran and Catarman respectively

Project Office Operations Manual (OM) developed

§  Project Office Operations Manual developed and finalized on April 2006

Project Financial Operations Manual (FOM) developed

§  Project Financial Operations Manual (MDI) developed and finalized on April 2006

5.2

An effective project management framework is established.

Project Coordinating Committee (PCC) and Stakeholders Working Group (SWG) established

§  PCC established.  First meeting 24 February 2006.  Membership of PCC reviewed and revised

Inception Report including clarified project start-up parameters and adjustments to Project Milestones

§  Inception Report completed with adjustments to project milestones - submitted on 3 November 2005

PM communications and functional lines within and among PIMUs & PIMUs w/ stakeholders established

§  PM and communications structures and functional reporting lines within project and with stakeholders established

Revised and accepted Logframe

§  Revised logframe submitted (Balance 2005/2006 Annual Plan).  Endorsed by PCC

Project Implementation Plan (PIP-Annual Plan) developed

§  2005/2006 Annual Plan submitted to PCC and AusAID on 20 February 2006

§  2006/2007 Annual Plan developed on 5 April 2006

Risk Management Plan developed

§  Risk Management Plan developed as part of MDI bid to RFT

Financial Management system installed

§  Financial management system (MDI) installed during inception phase

Safety and Security Plan (SSP) developed

§  Safety and Security Plan prepared during inception phase on December 2005

5.3

Project M&E, Quality Assurance Framework and Sustainability strategy developed & installed

 

Project  indicators based on revised Logframe

§  Accomplished – indicators have been developed according to the revised log frame on February 2006

Baseline Study Plan developed

§  Draft Baseline Study prepared March 2006

M&E Framework (includes Strategy) developed based on the revised and accepted Logframe

§  Draft M&E Framework and Strategy developed March 2006 based on the revised log frame

Sustainability Plan developed

§  Sustainability strategy developed.  Included as annex to the 2005/2006 Annual Plan

5.4

Effective relationships established and maintained between DepED, AusAID, other donors and AMC.

Advocacy Plan developed

§  Draft Advocacy Plan submitted as annex to the 2006/2007 Annual Plan

Conducted PCC meetings (3 meetings)

§  First PCC meeting convened 24 February 2006

Documented interaction with relevant  institutions

§  Meetings with SEAMEO-Innotech, JICA and donors working in each province

Documented interaction with relevant  projects

§  BEAM launch of “MYSPACE”, Field visit to BEAM February 2006, 24 March 2006 to discuss collaboration, ATL meeting in October 2005, Visit to BEAM in August re: design

5.5

Project Management Framework and the Sustainability Plan Implemented

Annual Plans developed

§  Draft 2005/2006 Annual Plan submitted to AusAID 10 February 2006

§  Draft 2006/2007 Annual Plan submitted 3 April 2006

Documented Project Adjustments & Strategies

§  As part of annual planning process, project adjustments and revised strategies are documented

Risk Management plan updated quarterly

§  Risk Management Plan updated initially during inception phase and for 2005/2006 Annual Plan at end of February 2006.

§  Three updates had been done during the 2006/07 Annual Plan, 7 April 2006, 30 June 2006, 30 September 2006

Safety and Security Plan (SSP) updated quarterly

§  All quarterly updates on the Safety and Security Plan had been done

5.6

PME Framework and Plan implemented

Baseline data collected and analyzed

§  Draft Baseline Report prepared March 2006

M&E Instruments & Report forms developed

§  M&E Instruments and Report forms revised and updated

QAP Certifications achieved on time

§  Achieved six (6) Milestones certified by QAP:

1.  Inception Report

2.  Annual Plan

2.a)  2005/2006 Annual Plan

2.b)  2006/2007 Annual Plan

3.  Master Training Plan

4.  DepED/NEAP Trainers Trained

5.  Distance Education/ Alternative Learning Programs

Simplified Monitoring Brief (SMB)

§  SMT Report prepared for 2005/2006 Annual Plan & for 2006/2007 Annual Plan

5.7

Project financial management system is implemented to achieve value for money.

Monthly reports submitted

§  12 Monthly financial reports submitted (MDI) (from October 2005 to October 2006)

 

 

 

- STAGE 2 - PROJECT BRIEF -

 

PANINGKAMOT – PAGSIKAPAN (STRIVE) is a DepED project supported by the Government of Australia through AusAID, intended to provide flexible and responsive assistance in strengthening basic education in selected provinces in the Visayas and to provide basic education opportunities to out-of-school children and youth, including piloting support options for out-of-school children and youth.

 

 

  PARTNERS:

 

GoP

- A Project of the Department of Education

- Coordinated by EDPITAF

 

 

 

 

GoA

- Supported by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)

- With Technical Assistance from the Melbourne Development Institute (MDI)

 

 

 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

 

 

GOAL:

To contribute to the improvement in the quality of, and access to, basic education in the Visayas

 

 

PURPOSE:

To develop and strengthen selected education management and learning support systems, in part by applying and modifying available responses for improved access to quality basic education appropriate to geographic isolated and disadvantaged populations

 

 

COMPONENTS:

C.1.   School Based Management Support System

Objective:  Strengthen the support systems of DepED, three Regional Offices, selected Divisions and schools for School Based Management through improved educational planning and management

 

C.2.   Human Resource Development (In-Service Teacher Education) Systems

Objective:  Develop Regional In-Service Education and Training (INSET) Systems for teachers and capability building at national, regional, division and school levles to support the implementation of in-service teacher education and training

 

C.3.   Learning Resources Materials Development System

Objective:  Develop a system for assessing, acquiring, adapting, developing, producing and distributing quality learning materials resource for students and instructional support materials for teachers

 

C.4.   Project Management

Objective:  Manage the project in an effective, efficient and responsive manner.

 

 

Scope:

§      Three Regional Offices of the Visayas (VI, VII and VIII)

§      Selected Focal Divisions – 3 in Year 1, with additional Divisions

Duration:

 

Timing:

§      36 months

 

§      July 2007 to June 2010

 

 

       Project Structure

 

GOAL: To contribute to the improvement in the quality of, and access to, basic education in the Visayas

 

PURPOSE: To develop and strengthen selected education management and learning support systems, in part by applying and modifying available responses for improved access to quality basic education appropriate to geographic isolated and disadvantaged populations

 

C.1   School Based Management Support System

C.2    Human Resource Development (In-Service Teacher Education) Systems

C.3       Learning Resources Materials Development System

C.4    PROJECT MANAGEMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.1  Strengthened School Management

c.2.1  Support and training to NEAP

c.3.1    Strengthened learning resource materials distribution systems at Region and Division

c.4.1  Consultation and Direction

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.2  Strengthened community support for school improvement

c.2.2  Catalog and digitize available INSET materials

c.3.2    Support for improved acquisition of quality learning resource materials

c.4.2  Planning and Reporting

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.3  Strengthened education governance mechanisms

c.2.3  Enhanced INSET training programs based on NCBTS

c.3.3    Catalog and digitize available learning materials

c.4.3  Project Management and Administration

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.4 Strengthened Division management support and monitoring of schools

c.2.4  Strengthen teacher application of the CFSS

c.3.4    Enhanced provision of learning resource materials to schools and learners

c.4.4  Monitoring, Evaluation and Sustainability

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.5 Strengthened management and monitoring by Divisions

c.2.5  Improved integration between Pre and In-service programs

c.3.5     Enhanced learning materials for ADMs and ALS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.6 Stronger management of reform efforts at Region and Division

c.2.6  Development and utilization of QA systems for INSET

c.3.6     Development and utilization of QA systems for learning resource provision

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.7 Stronger planning and management of ADMs, ALS and Health and Nutrition

c.2.7  Development and utilization of ICT solutions for development and delivery of INSET

c.3.7     Development/use of ICT solutions for development/ delivery of learning resources

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.8 Strengthened public-private partnership to improve TLE programming

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.9 Development and utilization of QA systems for planning and management

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c.1.10 Development and utilization of ICT solutions for management

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

AUSTRALIAN ASSISTANCE TO DATE

 

Education has consistently been one of the major elements in the Philippines Australia Development Cooperation Program (PADCP). The achievements of Australian assistance have been well recognised by the GoP and other donors. This support has included assistance to the Technical and Vocational Education (TVET) sector, including the Philippines-Australia Vocational Education Project (PATVEP), the Philippines-Australia Quality Technical Vocational Education Training (PAQTVET) and (importantly) in the basic education sector through several successful projects including the Philippines Australia Science and Maths Education Project (PASMEP) and the Project on Basic Education (PROBE).

 

The Pre-Feasibility mission identified a number of options for assistance that would build on this previous success and the lessons learned. The provision of additional assistance to basic education was one of several key requests from the Secretary of Education as part of the Pre-Feasibility phase consultations.

 

Of direct relevance to this design is the ongoing Australian support for the GoP basic education system through the Basic Education Assistance for Mindanao project (BEAM Phase I: 2001-2004) and the impending BEAM Phase II (2004-2008). It is important that this proposed new intervention, as detailed in this PDD, fully capitalizes upon the wealth of past and current experience in this sector.

 

 

 

1.2 PROJECT ORIGINS AND PREPARATION

 

A Pre-Feasibility study in November . December 2003 was commissioned by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) to identify possible options for further Australian assistance to the Philippines education sector. The study identified a .long-list. Of fifteen possible activities that key stakeholders agreed as priority areas. The major elements of the proposed activities were analysed and (where appropriate) combined, leading to the development of five prioritised options for further consideration by AusAID and the Government of the Philippines (GoP).

 

After due consideration, the partner governments identified two of the five options as suitable for further analysis and development. A Feasibility mission was commissioned by AusAID in February-March 2004 in order to facilitate key decisions concerning the project locations and the feasibility of implementation in the chosen locations. This involved two feasibility studies as indicated below:

 

 

a) Accreditation of Madari Schools

 

“An intervention that focussed on Madrasah in Mindanao, with an aim to assist madaris gain DepEd accreditation, while maintaining the Madrasah.s role within the Islamic community”.

 

b) Education and Training for In-School and Out of School Children/Youth

 

“An intervention in the Basic Education in the Visayas, located in Bohol and Northern Samar and with a focus on improvements in education quality in Science, Mathematics and English. Support will also be provided through programs that attract and retain students in schools and provide training and options for out-of-school youth”.

 

The two Feasibility Studies were conducted in parallel and the findings presented to key stakeholders in Manila for consideration on Monday, March 8th  2004. AusAID referred the Madaris Accreditation Feasibility for additional analysis and to gather more data and information.

 

However, the meeting recommended a design team immediately be commissioned to produce a Project Design Document (PDD) for the proposed “Education and Training for In-School and Out of School Children/Youth” intervention. The design team conducted their field mission from 9th-22nd March 2004.

 

1.3 PROJECT PREPARATION CONSIDERATIONS

 

In development of this project account has been taken of the following considerations:

·             Previous and current interventions by AusAID (and other donors) in the basic education sector, particularly the PROBE and BEAM;

·             GoP funding and ongoing support capacity;

·              Goals of the Philippine EFA 2015 Plan;

·              Project alignment with AusAID.s Country Program Strategy (CPS) and the match with the educational policies of both governments;

·             Cross-cutting issues of poverty alleviation, human rights, governance, peace and order, gender and the environment;

·             Impact on access and equity;

·             Links to the previous AusAID funded Area Focus Studies; and

·             The need for flexibility.

 

1.4 METHODOLOGY

 

In undertaking the Project Design Mission, the team:

·       Reviewed a range of relevant literature collected from AusAID desk personnel in Canberra; the Post in Manila; NEDA; DepEd National, Region and Division; Provincial Planning and Development Offices (PPDO); and a range of other agencies working in basic education in the Philippines (see References);

·       During the Feasibility-Design period, held a series of meetings and consultations with DepEd staff, key officials in other GoP agencies, staff involved in the management and implementation of World Bank and ADB-funded projects in basic education, other donor representatives, representatives of UNICEF and NGOs, staff involved in teacher education, and GoP personnel involved with PROBE and now BEAM;

·       Visited Bohol and Northern Samar twice to meet with key officials of NEDA, PPDO, DepEd, TESDA, the University education faculties, teachers, school children and community members. In addition, the team met with representatives of selected NGOs and were able to visit and observe different types of DepEd schools and livelihood training establishments;

·       Held two stakeholder workshops, one in Bohol and the other in Northern Samar. Some fifty persons representing a broad mix of stakeholders, including representatives of Parent Teacher Associations, attended. These workshops provided an opportunity for the design team to explain the purpose and scope of the mission, and to subsequently obtain valuable input to the PDD design process;

·       Held regular review team meetings to analyse the information collected and to synthesize responses in terms of the TOR;

·       Tested preliminary conclusions and the likely project design framework through further follow-up meetings;

·       Presented the draft findings of the Design Mission to key stakeholders in the form of an Aide Memoire in Manila on 22nd March 2004 prior to the departure of the Australian team members for Australia;

 

 

1.5 THE PARTNER AGENCY

 

The Partner Agency will be DepEd Central office. Implementation will be largely devolved to DepEd Division and District Offices located in Bohol and Northern Samar, with the DepEd Central providing the chair of the Project Coordinating Committee (PCC) and providing strategic oversight, with the Region VII and VIII Offices assuming a monitoring role. Implementation of project initiatives involving the out of school children and youth will require strong working linkages with the PPDOs, Bureau of NFE, NGOs, TESDA and the local communities, who are each active in the non-formal basic education sector.

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

Project Origin and Design Preparation

 

A Pre-Feasibility study in November.December 2003 was commissioned by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) to identify possible options for further Australian assistance to the Philippines education sector. The study identified a “long-list” of fifteen possible activities that key stakeholders agreed were priority areas The major elements of these fifteen proposed activities were analysed and (where appropriate) combined, leading to the development of five prioritised options for further consideration by AusAID and the Government of the Philippines (GoP).

 

After due consideration, the partner governments identified two of the five options as suitable for further analysis and development. A Feasibility mission was commissioned by AusAID in February-March 2004 in order to facilitate key decisions concerning the project locations, as well as the feasibility of implementation in the chosen locations. This involved the development of two feasibility studies as are indicated below:

 

·              Accreditation of Madaris

 

An intervention focussed on Madrasah in Mindanao, with a focus on science, mathematics and English with the aim to assist madaris gain DepEd accreditation, while at the same time maintaining role of the Madrasah within the Islamic community.

 

·             Education and Training for In-School and Out of School Children/Youth

 

An intervention in the Provinces of Bohol and Northern Samar with a focus on student improvements in science, mathematics and English, together with support for programs that attract and retain students in schools and provide an integrated program of literacy, numeracy and livelihood opportunities for out-of-school youth.

 

The two Feasibility Studies were conducted in parallel and the findings presented to key stakeholders in Manila for their consideration on Monday, March 8th 2004. At the meeting, AusAID deferred design work on the Madaris Accreditation pending additional analysis and to gather more data and information. However, AusAID approved the Basic Education Feasibility report outlining assistance to parts of the Visayas for in-school and out-of-school children and youth.

 

The meeting thus recommended that a design team immediately be commissioned to produce a Project Design Document (PDD) for the “Education and Training for In-School and Out of School Children / Youth”. The design team conducted their field mission from 9th-22nd March 2004 and submitted the draft PDD to AusAID in April 2004.

 

Bohol Context

 

The province of Bohol, one of the 4 provinces in Region VII, comprises the main island of Bohol and a number of small islands, mainly located along the north and west coasts. Administratively the province comprises 47 municipalities and one city, the provincial capital of Tagbilaran. The total population of Bohol based on the 2000 Census of Population and Housing, was 1,139,130 having grown at the average annual growth rate of 2.95 percent during the intercensal period 1995-2000. If this growth rate continues, the population of Bohol is expected to double in about 23 years. Bohol was a focus province of the AusAID funded Area Focus Studies conducted during 2001-2002.

 

There are currently a total of 174,660 students enrolled in over 900 elementary schools (90,800 male and 83,860 female) and 72,538 in over 50 secondary schools (35,803 male and 36,725 female). The public school system absorbs approximately 91% of the total school enrolments.

 

There are over 5000 elementary teachers and over 2000 secondary teachers. LGUs/municipal authorities recruit and pay for some teachers, particularly at secondary level. Generally the terms and conditions of these teachers are considerably inferior to nationally paid teachers and often they are less qualified. Student: teacher ratio at the elementary level is 34.1 and 36.1 at the secondary level.

 

National assessments indicate Bohol elementary results are below the national average in mathematics and science, and for secondary, below in mathematics, science and English.

 

Northern Samar Context

 

Northern Samar has 30 School Districts, 569 barangays (local administrative areas) and a population in 2000 estimated at 500,639, comprising almost equal numbers of male a